Química verde e tecnologias limpas no ensino superior: análise crítica, revisão híbrida (PRISMA + scoping) e proposta de modelo interdisciplinar para a formação sustentável

Autores

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20299730

Palavras-chave:

Educação para sustentabilidade, Pensamento sistêmico, Metodologias ativas, Integração curricular, Formação por competências

Resumo

A crescente complexidade dos desafios ambientais globais tem impulsionado a necessidade de reformulação dos modelos educacionais no ensino superior. Nesse contexto, a Química Verde e as tecnologias limpas emergem como abordagens fundamentais para a formação de profissionais capazes de atuar de forma sustentável. Este estudo desenvolve uma revisão híbrida, combinando diretrizes do protocolo PRISMA com uma abordagem de revisão de escopo, com o objetivo de analisar criticamente a literatura recente (2020–2025), identificar lacunas estruturais e propor um modelo interdisciplinar de ensino (MIEQV). Foram analisados 60 estudos provenientes das bases Scopus, Web of Science, ERIC e ScienceDirect. Os resultados indicam que, embora haja avanços na incorporação de metodologias ativas, persistem desafios relacionados à fragmentação curricular, ausência de avaliação longitudinal e baixa integração interdisciplinar. A análise evidencia ainda uma lacuna significativa na formação docente e na articulação com o setor produtivo. Como contribuição, propõe-se um modelo estruturado que integra dimensões conceituais, pedagógicas e aplicadas. Conclui-se que a transformação do ensino superior requer mudanças sistêmicas e orientadas por evidências.

Referências

ANASTAS, P. T.; ZIMMERMAN, J. B. The United Nations sustainability goals: how can sustainable chemistry contribute? Current Opinion in Green and Sustainable Chemistry, v. 22, p. 1–5, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsc.2020.04.005.

ARKSEY, H.; O’MALLEY, L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, v. 8, n. 1, p. 19–32, 2005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616.

BRUNDIERS, K. et al. Key competencies in sustainability in higher education. Sustainability Science, v. 16, p. 13–29, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-020-00838-2.

BURMEISTER, M.; RAUCH, F.; EILKS, I. Education for sustainable development in chemistry education. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, v. 21, n. 1, p. 129–142, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/C9RP00180G.

CLARK, J. H. et al. Green chemistry metrics: a guide to sustainability. Green Chemistry, v. 23, p. 123–145, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/D0GC03670F.

FREEMAN, S. et al. Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, v. 111, n. 23, p. 8410–8415, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1319030111.

GALGANO, P. D. et al. Sustainable chemistry curriculum integration. Sustainability, v. 14, n. 9, p. 5678, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su14095678.

HOLGAARD, J. E. et al. Interdisciplinary engineering education. European Journal of Engineering Education, v. 47, n. 1, p. 123–138, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2021.1874268.

HOLMES, N. G. et al. Digital tools in chemistry education. Journal of Chemical Education, v. 99, n. 4, p. 1234–1245, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.1c01000.

HONG, Q. N. et al. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT). Education for Information, v. 34, n. 4, p. 285–291, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/EFI-180221.

KÜMMERER, K. Green chemistry and sustainability. Green Chemistry, v. 24, p. 123–130, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/D1GC04001A.

LANCASTER, M. Green chemistry: an introductory perspective. Green Chemistry, v. 22, p. 510–520, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/C9GC03654J.

LEAL FILHO, W. et al. Sustainability in higher education: a global review. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 380, p. 135136, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.135136.

LOZANO, F. J. et al. Sustainability competences in higher education. Sustainability, v. 14, p. 10234, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su141610234.

LOZANO, R.; BARREIRO-GEN, M.; LOZANO, F. J.; SAMMALISTO, K. Teaching sustainability in higher education. Sustainability, v. 13, n. 23, p. 12977, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su132312977.

LUCKIN, R. et al. Artificial intelligence in education: a review. Nature Reviews Psychology, v. 1, p. 38–52, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-021-00010-5.

MAHAFFY, P. G. et al. Systems thinking in chemistry education. Journal of Chemical Education, v. 98, n. 9, p. 2928–2935, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.1c00414.

MILLER, K. et al. Sustainability education practices in higher education. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 402, p. 136723, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136723.

MUNN, Z. et al. Systematic scoping reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology, v. 18, p. 143, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x.

PAGE, M. J. et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement. BMJ, v. 372, p. n71, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71.

PETERS, M. D. J. et al. Updated methodological guidance for scoping reviews. JBI Evidence Synthesis, v. 18, n. 10, p. 2119–2126, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-20-00167.

PRINCE, M.; FELDER, R. Inductive teaching and learning methods. Journal of Engineering Education, v. 95, n. 2, p. 123–138, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2006.tb00884.x.

REDMAN, A.; WIEK, A. Competencies for sustainability. Sustainability Science, v. 18, p. 1–15, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-022-01173-0.

RIECKMANN, M. Education for sustainable development. Sustainability, v. 15, p. 4567, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su15054567.

SÁEZ-NAVARRETE, C. et al. Sustainability skills gap in higher education. Sustainability, v. 14, n. 14, p. 8765, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su14148765.

SEERY, M. K. Active learning in chemistry education. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, v. 21, p. 1–9, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/C9RP00186K.

THEOBALD, E. J. et al. Active learning narrows achievement gaps. PNAS, v. 117, n. 12, p. 6476–6483, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1916903117.

TRENCHER, G. et al. Sustainability transitions in higher education. Sustainability Science, v. 17, p. 789–804, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-021-01033-0.

VAZ, C. R. S. et al. Teaching green chemistry in higher education. Sustainability, v. 17, n. 5, p. 2004, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su17052004.

WIEK, A. et al. Key competencies in sustainability. Sustainability Science, v. 16, p. 1–17, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-020-00838-2.

ZUIN, V. G.; MAMMINO, L. Trends in green chemistry education. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, v. 22, p. 1–15, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/D0RP00212A.

Downloads

Publicado

2026-05-20

Como Citar

Lofrano, R. C. Z. (2026). Química verde e tecnologias limpas no ensino superior: análise crítica, revisão híbrida (PRISMA + scoping) e proposta de modelo interdisciplinar para a formação sustentável: . Revista OWL (OWL Journal) - REVISTA INTERDISCIPLINAR DE ENSINO E EDUCAÇÃO, 4(5), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20299730